JMS Poet Project
“Poetry is just the evidence of life. If your life is burning well, poetry is just the ash.” - Leonard Cohen

CLASS CHALLENGE: 30 POETS in 3 MINUTES


7th Grade Classes - Dennis/Summerour

 

Task:  Our goal is to introduce 30 poets (nearly!) in 3 minutes each (90 minutes total).  Since we only have 3 minutes for each poet, we will need to be creative and organized with our research.  You will only have 3 minutes to bring your poet to life!

 

Let’s break down our task into steps:

 

STEP 1: We have a list of 30 famous poets.  Everyone will need to choose ONE poet.

 

STEP 2: As a class, we will brainstorm questions to plan our research.  First question: “What questions do we need to ask about our poet to be able to cover his or her life in 3 minutes?”  Next, we will analyze and evaluate our list of questions and choose the most important ones for our project.

 

Note: Since we only have 3 minutes to present your poem, your teacher would like you to complete an analysis of one of poem written by your poet.  What poem do you think best represents your poet’s work? 

 

STEP 3: How will we organize our research notes to carefully collect information?  How will we record what resources we use (to give credit to our sources)?

 

STEP 4: What resources will help us find the answers to our questions?  (Ms. Pals, our library media specialist, has collected books, magazine articles, websites, and database recommendations to save us time!)

 

STEP 5: Create a visual aid to support your 3 minute presentation.  What would be the most effective visual aid for my audience (the class)?  Examples: PowerPoint, poster, PhotoStory, Comic Life, FLIP camera, etc.  Since we only have 2 days to complete the visual aid, which one should we choose?  (Note: think about what access you have at home to technology.)

 

STEP 6: How will we know if our presentations are ready for our audience?  What if Mr. McGlennen or Ms. Corbett came for a visit?  Would we be proud for them to hear our 3 minutes?  How could we create a rubric to judge ourselves BEFORE we actually present?   What other ways could we prepare ourselves?

 

REMEMBER: No one cares about a boring list of facts!  A good presentation makes us care about the poet.  Turn your facts into a story for your audience--use vivid details and examples.  You should leave your audience wanting to know more!  J

 

INTERNET RESOURCES:

 

GALILEO Databases: 

Use Quick Links at school.  At home, log into http://galileo.usg.edu with school password.

Shel Silverstein

www.shelsilverstein.com

www.poets.org    

 

Robert Louis Stevenson

http://www.nls.uk/rlstevenson/index.html

http://people.brandeis.edu/~teuber/stevensonbio.html

www.poets.org

 

Christina Rossetti

http://www.kirjasto.sci.fi/rossetti.htm

http://anglicanhistory.org/bios/cgrossetti.html

http://www.victorianweb.org/authors/crossetti/index.html

http://www.humanitiesweb.org/human.php?s=r&p=a&a=i&ID=782

www.poets.org

 

Roald Dahl

www.roalddahl.com

www.poets.org

 

Rudyard Kipling

http://www.kipling.org.uk/kip_fra.htm

http://nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/literature/laureates/1907/kipling-bio.html

www.poets.org

 

Maya Angelou

www.mayaangelou.com

www.poets.org

http://www.achievement.org/autodoc/page/ang0bio-1

 

Walt Whitman

http://www.whitmanarchive.org/ 

http://www.waltwhitman.org 

www.poets.org

 

Carl Sandburg

http://carl-sandburg.com/

http://www.nps.gov/carl/forkids/thepoetsjournal.htm

http://poetlaureate.il.gov/sandburg.cfm

www.poets.org 

 

Edgar Allen Poe

http://www.online-literature.com/poe/

http://www.poemuseum.org/poes_life/index.html

http://www.kirjasto.sci.fi/eapoe.htm

www.poets.org

 

Gary Soto

http://www.garysoto.com/index.html

http://content.scholastic.com/browse/contributor.jsp?id=3642

www.poets.org

http://www.notablebiographies.com/news/Sh-Z/Soto-Gary.html

 

Emily Dickinson

http://www.english.uiuc.edu/maps/poets/a_f/dickinson/dickinson.htm

http://www.emilydickinsonmuseum.org/about_emily_dickinson

www.poets.org

 

William Shakespeare

http://www.shakespeare-online.com/

www.poets.org

 

Robert Frost

www.poets.org

http://www.frostfriends.org/

http://www.english.uiuc.edu/maps/poets/a_f/frost/life.htm

 

Theodore Seuss Geisel

http://www.catinthehat.org/history.htm

www.poets.org

http://www.seussville.com/seussentennial/resources1.html

 

William Blake

http://www.online-literature.com/blake/

http://www.britainexpress.com/History/bio/blake.htm

www.poets.org

 

Edward Lear

http://www.nonsenselit.org/Lear

www.poets.org

http://www.bencourtney.com/ebooks/lear/ 

 

Robert Browning

http://www.victorianweb.org/authors/rb/rbbio.html

http://www.kirjasto.sci.fi/browning.htm

www.poets.org

 

William Carlos Williams

http://www.poemhunter.com/william-carlos-williams/biography/

www.poets.org

 

Lewis Carroll

http://www.lewiscarroll.org/carroll.html

www.poets.org

http://www.victorianweb.org/authors/carroll/carrollov.html

http://lewiscarrollsociety.org.uk/pages/lewiscarroll/life.html

 

Nikki Giovanni

http://nikki-giovanni.com/

www.poets.org

http://www.writerswrite.com/journal/jul00/giovanni.htm

 

Anne Morrow Lindbergh

http://www.greatwomen.org/women.php?action=viewone&id=98

http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/amex/lindbergh/sfeature/anne.html

http://www.lindberghfoundation.org/

 

Paul Laurence Dunbar

http://www.dunbarsite.org/

http://www.poets.org/poet.php/prmPID/302

http://www.coax.net/people/lwf/DUNBAR.HTM

 

J.R.R. Tolkien

http://www.tolkiensociety.org/tolkien/index.html

http://www.indepthinfo.com/tolkien/biography.shtml

http://www.leaderu.com/humanities/wood-biography.html

 

Phyllis Wheatley:

http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/aia/part2/2p12.html

http://womenshistory.about.com/od/aframerwriters/a/philliswheatley.htm

http://www.masshist.org/endofslavery/?queryID=57

http://www.lkwdpl.org/wihohio/whea-phi.htm

 

Langston Hughes

http://www.kansasheritage.org/crossingboundaries/page6e1.html

http://www.galegroup.com/free_resources/bhm/bio/hughes_l.htm

http://www.howard.edu/library/reference/guides/hughes/default.htm

http://www.americaslibrary.gov/cgi-bin/page.cgi/aa/hughes

www.poets.org

 

Robert Burns

www.poets.org

http://www.burnsheritagepark.com/attraction.php?id=1 (Note: If you’re selected to be on the JHS Scotland Exchange program, this is a place you’ll visit!)

http://www.nls.uk/burns/index.htm

 

Lucille Clifton
www.poets.org
http://www.poetryfoundation.org/archive/poet.html?id=1304

 

Edna St. Vincent Millay
www.poets.org

http://www.poetryfoundation.org/archive/poet.html?id=4717

 

 Tupac Shakur

http://www.tasf.org/news_article.asp?id=104

www.poets.org

 

E.E. Cummings

www.poets.org

 

Henry Wadsworth Longfellow

http://www.nps.gov/long/historyculture/henry-wadsworth-longfellow.htm http://www.hwlongfellow.org/life_overview.shtml
www.poets.org

 

 

While taking notes, remember - avoid plagiarism!

To create a citation: www.easybib.com

 

1st & 2nd Periods - Poetry Project Rubric (Created by Class)

 

5

4

3

2

1

Research
 Process

  • Focused and on-topic

  • Organized in note-taking

  • Cites all sources

  • Uses reliable, quality sources

  • Answers questions completely with detailed information rather than by opinion (or by memory)

  • Summarizes, paraphrases, and quotes correctly to avoid plagiarism 

  • Uses time wisely

 

 

  • Focused and almost always on-topic

  • Mostly organized in note-taking

  • Cites sources

  • Uses reliable sources

  • Answers questions completely with information rather than by opinion (or by memory)

  • Summarizes, paraphrases, and quotes correctly to avoid plagiarism 

  • Uses time wisely

 

 

  • Focused and mostly on-topic

  • Somewhat organized in note-taking

  • Cites some sources

  • Uses an  unreliable source

  • Answers most questions with information, but some is based on opinion

  • Summarizes, paraphrases, and quotes to avoid plagiarism 

  • Could budget time more carefully

  • Lacks focus and is often off-topic

  • Notes are disorganized

  • Does not cite sources

  • Uses unreliable sources (example: uses a student-created website!)

  • Answers some research questions

  • but most is based on opinion

  • Some problems with plagiarism – student does not use summarizing, paraphrasing, or quoting correctly

  • Does not budget time

  • No focus and off-topic

  • Notes are disorganized and incomplete.

  • Notes don’t answer research questions

  • Gives opinion rather than information to answer questions

  • Uses summarizing, paraphrasing, and quoting incorrectly and shows problems with plagiarism

  • Wastes class time

 

POINTS

25                            23 22                                20 19                           17 16                             15 14                              0

Visual

  • Helps audience to understand poet

  • Creatively answers some of the research questions

  • Organized, neat and professional

  • Catches eye of audience

  • No distracting images

  • On-topic and focused

  • Helps audience to understand poet

  • Answers some of the research questions

  • Organized and neat

  • Catches eye of audience

  • A few distracting images

  • On-topic

  • Helps audience to understand poet

  • Answers a few research questions

  • Organized

  • Some distracting images

  • Somewhat on-topic

  • Does not help reinforce your poet to the audience

  • Does not answer research questions

  • Somewhat disorganized

  • Contains distracting images

  • Somewhat off-topic

  • Off-topic

  • Doesn’t help answer research questions

  • All images, no content

  • Distracting images and/or text

  • Messy, disorganized

  • Confuses audience

POINTS

25                              23 22                                 20 19                            17 16                              15 14                               0

Presentation

  • Focused and organized

  • Answers the research questions completely

  • Creatively uses answers to tell an exciting story

  • Uses 3 minutes to the fullest!

  • Voice projects to the whole audience

  • Shows preparation and is  ready to present

  • Grabs audience’s attention with an exciting “hook”

  • Leaves the audience wanting more!

  • Focused and mostly organized

  • Answers the research questions  

  • Creatively uses answers to tell a story

  • Uses 2 ½ to 3 minutes

  • Voice projects to the audience

  • Shows preparation and is ready to present

  • Grabs audience’s attention with an “hook”

  • Leaves the audience wanting more!

  • Focused but somewhat disorganized

  • Answers most research questions

  • Uses answers tell a story

  • Uses less than 2 ½  minutes

  • Voice projects to most of audience

  • Shows some preparation

  • Some attempt to “grab” audience’s attention

  • Finishes without an exciting ending

  • Unfocused and disorganized

  • Answers some of the  research questions

  • Instead of telling a story, student gives  a list of facts

  • Uses less than 2  minutes

  • Does not project voice to audience

  • Shows little preparation

  • Makes little attempt to “grab” audience’s attention

  • Leaves the audience bored!

  • Unfocused and very disorganized

  • Does not answer research questions

  • Gives a boring list of facts

  • Uses less than 1 minute

  • Does not project voice

  • Not ready to present

  • Doesn’t “grab” your audience’s attention or leave them wanting to know more

POINTS

25                             23 22                                 20 19                           17 16                               15 14                               0

Poetry Analysis

Includes 10-9 elements of the following: metaphor, simile, personification, rhyme scheme, internal rhyme, alliteration, onomatopoeia, hyperbole, tone/mood, and theme Includes 8-7 elements of the following: metaphor, simile, personification, rhyme scheme, internal rhyme, alliteration, onomatopoeia, hyperbole, tone/mood, and theme Includes 6-4 elements of the following: metaphor, simile, personification, rhyme scheme, internal rhyme, alliteration, onomatopoeia, hyperbole, tone/mood, and theme Includes 3-2 elements of the following: metaphor, simile, personification, rhyme scheme, internal rhyme, alliteration, onomatopoeia, hyperbole, tone/mood, and theme Includes 1-0 elements of the following: metaphor, simile, personification, rhyme scheme, internal rhyme, alliteration, onomatopoeia, hyperbole, tone/mood, and theme

POINTS

25                              23 22                                 20 19                           17 16                               15 14                               0

 

4th - 5th Period Rubric:

 

5

4

3

2

1

Research
 Process

  • Focused and on-topic

  • Organized in note-taking

  • Cites all sources

  • Uses reliable, quality sources

  • Answers questions completely with detailed information rather than by opinion (or by memory)

  • Summarizes, paraphrases, and quotes correctly to avoid plagiarism 

  • Uses time wisely

 

 

  • Focused and almost always on-topic

  • Mostly organized in note-taking

  • Cites sources

  • Uses reliable sources

  • Answers questions completely with information rather than by opinion (or by memory)

  • Summarizes, paraphrases, and quotes correctly to avoid plagiarism 

  • Uses time wisely

 

 

  • Focused and mostly on-topic

  • Somewhat organized in note-taking

  • Cites some sources

  • Uses an  unreliable source

  • Answers most questions with information, but some is based on opinion

  • Summarizes, paraphrases, and quotes to avoid plagiarism 

  • Could budget time more carefully

  • Lacks focus and is often off-topic

  • Notes are disorganized

  • Does not cite sources

  • Uses unreliable sources (example: uses a student-created website!)

  • Answers some research questions

  • but most is based on opinion

  • Some problems with plagiarism – student does not use summarizing, paraphrasing, or quoting correctly

  • Does not budget time

  • No focus and off-topic

  • Notes are disorganized and incomplete.

  • Notes don’t answer research questions

  • Gives opinion rather than information to answer questions

  • Uses summarizing, paraphrasing, and quoting incorrectly and shows problems with plagiarism

  • Wastes class time

 

POINTS

32                             30 29                               27 26                         24 23                             20 19                             0

Visual

  • Helps audience to understand poet

  • Creatively answers some of the research questions

  • Organized, neat and professional

  • Catches eye of audience

  • No distracting images

  • On-topic and focused

  • Helps audience to understand poet

  • Answers some of the research questions

  • Organized and neat

  • Catches eye of audience

  • A few distracting images

  • On-topic

  • Helps audience to understand poet

  • Answers a few research questions

  • Organized

  • Some distracting images

  • Somewhat on-topic

  • Does not help reinforce your poet to the audience

  • Does not answer research questions

  • Somewhat disorganized

  • Contains distracting images

  • Somewhat off-topic

  • Off-topic

  • Doesn’t help answer research questions

  • All images, no content

  • Distracting images and/or text

  • Messy, disorganized

  • Confuses audience

POINTS

34                              30 29                                27 26                            23 22                              20 19                               0

Presentation

  • Focused and organized

  • Answers the research questions completely

  • Creatively uses answers to tell an exciting story

  • Uses 3 minutes to the fullest!

  • Voice projects to the whole audience

  • Shows preparation and is  ready to present

  • Grabs audience’s attention with an exciting “hook”

  • Leaves the audience wanting more!

  • Focused and mostly organized

  • Answers the research questions  

  • Creatively uses answers to tell a story

  • Uses 2 ½ to 3 minutes

  • Voice projects to the audience

  • Shows preparation and is ready to present

  • Grabs audience’s attention with an “hook”

  • Leaves the audience wanting more!

  • Focused but somewhat disorganized

  • Answers most research questions

  • Uses answers tell a story

  • Uses less than 2 ½  minutes

  • Voice projects to most of audience

  • Shows some preparation

  • Some attempt to “grab” audience’s attention

  • Finishes without an exciting ending

  • Unfocused and disorganized

  • Answers some of the  research questions

  • Instead of telling a story, student gives  a list of facts

  • Uses less than 2  minutes

  • Does not project voice to audience

  • Shows little preparation

  • Makes little attempt to “grab” audience’s attention

  • Leaves the audience bored!

  • Unfocused and very disorganized

  • Does not answer research questions

  • Gives a boring list of facts

  • Uses less than 1 minute

  • Does not project voice

  • Not ready to present

  • Doesn’t “grab” your audience’s attention or leave them wanting to know more

POINTS

34                              30 29                                27 26                            23 22                              20 19                             0